StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0015N0.KQ$6210.00-6.55%
Fair $6210.00+0.0%

0015N0.KQ

0015N0.KQ

Consumer Defensive / Household & Personal ProductsKOSDAQ

$6210.00

-420.00 (-6.55%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6210.00Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.8B · quality 70.0/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 61/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0015N0.KQLocal privado en este navegador · 0015N0.KQ
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$78.1B

P/E

14.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.5x

↓

ROE

10.8%

↑

Gross Margin

68.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$6210
$5900$20250

TradingView lightweight chart

0015N0.KQ price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5,990Periodo -66.8%
Fair value: $6,210

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.2%

FCF CAGR

+123.7%

FCF margin

9.4%

FCF / Net income

1.05x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $51.19B · net income $4.58B · FCF $4.83B

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

68.2%+1.5% pts

Operating margin

10.0%+2.6% pts

Net margin

9.0%+21.9% pts

FCF margin

9.4%+7.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$51.19B$51.19B$52.60B$44.55B
Net Income$4.58B$4.58B$4.43B$-5.78B
EBITDA$6.96B$6.96B$7.47B$-1.95B
EPS441.00441.00433.00-289171.00
Gross Margin68.2%68.2%66.1%66.7%
Operating Margin10.0%10.0%10.7%7.5%
Net Margin9.0%9.0%8.4%-13.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.48-0.70
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.83B$4.83B$7.58B$965.8M
Returns
ROE10.8%10.8%23.7%36.6%
Valuation
P/E14.0814.08——
EV/EBITDA7.487.48——
P/B1.521.52——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-2.7%-2.7%18.1%—
EPS Growth1.8%1.8%100.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

7.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$551.03

Spread vs growth

-5.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

8.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$666.75

Spread vs growth

-6.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

9.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1073.81

Spread vs growth

-7.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -66.8%

Total return

-66.8%

Start / end P/E

41.7x → 13.6x

EPS bridge

433.00 → 441.00

Residual

-1.2%

EPS growth+1.8%
Multiple rerating-67.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.