StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0051.KL$0.10+0.00%
Fair $0.10+0.0%

0051.KL

Cuscapi Berhad

Technology / Software - ApplicationKuala Lumpur

$0.10

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.10Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.7M · quality 51.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0051.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Cuscapi Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$94M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

5.3x

↓

ROE

6.7%

↑

Gross Margin

33.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.03

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0051.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.100Periodo -72.6%
Fair value: $0.100

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+29.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

13.0%

FCF / Net income

0.95x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $28.1M · net income $3.8M · FCF $3.7M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.2%+72.0% pts

Operating margin

14.6%+160.4% pts

Net margin

13.6%+167.6% pts

FCF margin

13.0%+91.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$28.1M$28.1M$43.6M$9.9M$10.0M
Net Income$3.8M$3.8M$13.4M$-5.3M$-15.4M
EBITDA$17.7M$17.7M$19.0M$-2.2M$-8.2M
EPS——0.01-0.01-0.02
Gross Margin33.2%33.2%42.2%26.5%-38.8%
Operating Margin14.6%14.6%30.1%-61.3%-145.8%
Net Margin13.6%13.6%30.7%-53.3%-153.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.030.030.040.070.08
Current Ratio1.161.16———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.7M$3.7M$15.1M$-3.5M$-7.8M
Returns
ROE6.7%6.7%25.1%-10.1%-41.2%
Valuation
P/E——18.31——
EV/EBITDA5.305.3012.92——
P/B1.661.664.604.135.41
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-35.5%-35.5%338.7%-0.6%—
EPS Growth——340.7%67.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -42.9%

Total return

-42.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-42.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-42.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.