StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0116.KL$0.01+100.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

0116.KL

Focus Dynamics Group Berhad

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsKuala Lumpur

$0.01

+0.00 (+100.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 24/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.2M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

24/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 1unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 0116.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Focus Dynamics Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$64M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

5.7x

↓

ROE

-1.2%

↓

Gross Margin

60.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0116.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.010Periodo -91.8%
Fair value: $0.010

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

9.8%

FCF / Net income

-5.13x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $85.7M · net income $-1.6M · FCF $8.4M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

60.7%+16.3% pts

Operating margin

-0.2%-51.9% pts

Net margin

-1.9%-14.3% pts

FCF margin

9.8%+15.3% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$85.7M$85.7M$71.1M
Net Income$-1.6M$-1.6M$8.8M
EBITDA$15.4M$15.4M$20.0M
EPS-0.00-0.000.00
Gross Margin60.7%60.7%44.4%
Operating Margin-0.2%-0.2%51.7%
Net Margin-1.9%-1.9%12.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.02
Current Ratio0.490.49—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$8.4M$8.4M$-4.0M
Returns
ROE-1.2%-1.2%3.6%
Valuation
P/E——37.50
EV/EBITDA5.695.6912.32
P/B0.530.531.32
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth20.5%20.5%—
EPS Growth-125.0%-125.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -33.3%

Total return

-33.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.00 → -0.00

Residual

-33.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-33.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.