StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0158.KL$0.25+0.00%
Fair $0.25+0.0%

0158.KL

SCC Holdings Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Food DistributionKuala Lumpur

$0.25

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.25Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 61/B
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.7M · quality 53.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

61/100

B

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0158.KLLocal privado en este navegador · SCC Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$35M

P/E

8.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.0x

↓

ROE

7.0%

↑

Gross Margin

31.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0158.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.250Periodo +5.8%
Fair value: $0.250

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.2%

FCF / Net income

1.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $56.8M · net income $3.5M · FCF $4.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

31.8%+2.7% pts

Operating margin

6.5%+0.7% pts

Net margin

6.2%+2.2% pts

FCF margin

7.2%+19.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$56.8M$56.8M$57.2M$55.4M$63.9M
Net Income$3.5M$3.5M$340000.00$1.7M$2.6M
EBITDA$5.9M$5.9M$1.9M$3.7M$5.3M
EPS——0.000.010.02
Gross Margin31.8%31.8%24.2%27.5%29.1%
Operating Margin6.5%6.5%0.0%3.3%5.7%
Net Margin6.2%6.2%0.6%3.0%4.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.020.010.02
Current Ratio10.4310.43———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.1M$4.1M$2.7M$1.4M$-8.0M
Returns
ROE7.0%7.0%0.7%3.5%5.4%
Valuation
P/E8.338.33102.0826.6919.89
EV/EBITDA5.005.0015.7210.478.23
P/B0.700.700.720.931.07
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-0.8%-0.8%3.3%-13.4%—
EPS Growth——-79.7%-34.8%—
Dividend Yield4.0%4.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2.0%

Total return

+2.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.00 → n/d

Residual

-2.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-2.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.