StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0192.KL$0.38+1.33%
Fair $0.38+0.0%

0192.KL

Inta Bina Group Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.38

+0.00 (+1.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.38Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-7.5M · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0192.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Inta Bina Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$237M

P/E

5.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.1x

↓

ROE

16.1%

↑

Gross Margin

11.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.52

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0192.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.380Periodo +24.6%
Fair value: $0.380

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+17.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.19x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $750.6M · net income $40.3M · FCF $-7.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

11.6%+4.8% pts

Operating margin

7.6%+4.3% pts

Net margin

5.4%+3.3% pts

FCF margin

-1.0%+1.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$750.6M$750.6M$690.8M$650.1M$466.3M
Net Income$40.3M$40.3M$33.3M$22.9M$9.5M
EBITDA$83.0M$83.0M$62.0M$48.9M$28.7M
EPS——0.060.040.02
Gross Margin11.6%11.6%9.9%8.1%6.8%
Operating Margin7.6%7.6%6.3%5.2%3.3%
Net Margin5.4%5.4%4.8%3.5%2.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.520.520.580.390.57
Current Ratio1.411.41———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-7.5M$-7.5M$-17.1M$55.7M$-13.3M
Returns
ROE16.1%16.1%17.2%13.5%6.3%
Valuation
P/E5.435.438.496.3712.92
EV/EBITDA3.073.074.523.334.73
P/B0.930.931.460.860.81
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth8.7%8.7%6.3%39.4%—
EPS Growth——37.5%138.2%—
Dividend Yield7.9%7.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -16.1%

Total return

-16.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.06 → n/d

Residual

-24.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+7.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-24.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.