StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0202.KL$0.23+0.00%
Fair $0.23+0.0%

0202.KL

Radiant Globaltech Berhad

Technology / Electronics & Computer DistributionKuala Lumpur

$0.23

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.23Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.6M · quality 52.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0202.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Radiant Globaltech Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$125M

P/E

11.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.0x

↓

ROE

9.3%

↑

Gross Margin

40.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.20

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0202.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.225Periodo -57.5%
Fair value: $0.225

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.9%

FCF CAGR

+68.2%

FCF margin

26.1%

FCF / Net income

4.93x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $168.3M · net income $8.9M · FCF $44.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.1%+4.0% pts

Operating margin

12.3%+2.4% pts

Net margin

5.3%-0.1% pts

FCF margin

26.1%+19.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$168.3M$168.3M$141.5M$135.5M$137.6M
Net Income$8.9M$8.9M$8.0M$7.7M$7.5M
EBITDA$19.2M$19.2M$13.8M$13.9M$14.2M
EPS——0.020.010.01
Gross Margin40.1%40.1%38.9%39.5%36.1%
Operating Margin12.3%12.3%11.3%10.2%9.9%
Net Margin5.3%5.3%5.7%5.6%5.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.200.200.180.020.01
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$44.0M$44.0M$-7.3M$4.6M$9.2M
Returns
ROE9.3%9.3%10.0%10.3%9.6%
Valuation
P/E11.2511.2522.5521.2323.94
EV/EBITDA6.046.0412.8610.5010.71
P/B1.301.302.272.192.30
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth19.0%19.0%4.4%-1.5%—
EPS Growth——4.8%2.8%—
Dividend Yield2.7%2.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -19.7%

Total return

-19.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

-22.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-22.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.