StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0237.KL$0.19+0.00%
Fair $0.19+0.0%

0237.KL

Haily Group Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.19

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.19Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.4M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 10/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0237.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Haily Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$80M

P/E

6.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.8x

↓

ROE

9.9%

↑

Gross Margin

9.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0237.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.190Periodo -48.6%
Fair value: $0.190

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+30.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.8%

FCF / Net income

2.90x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $431.2M · net income $11.5M · FCF $33.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.0%-3.0% pts

Operating margin

3.7%-0.5% pts

Net margin

2.7%-0.7% pts

FCF margin

7.8%+11.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$431.2M$431.2M$320.8M$295.6M$196.3M
Net Income$11.5M$11.5M$8.7M$7.4M$6.6M
EBITDA$20.7M$20.7M$16.0M$13.9M$11.4M
EPS——0.020.020.02
Gross Margin9.0%9.0%9.6%8.9%12.0%
Operating Margin3.7%3.7%3.7%3.3%4.2%
Net Margin2.7%2.7%2.7%2.5%3.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.130.090.09
Current Ratio1.851.85———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$33.5M$33.5M$-1.4M$-6.7M$-7.5M
Returns
ROE9.9%9.9%8.0%8.6%8.2%
Valuation
P/E6.336.3310.9210.5610.27
EV/EBITDA1.851.855.205.234.35
P/B0.690.690.870.900.84
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth34.4%34.4%8.5%50.6%—
EPS Growth——11.2%11.4%—
Dividend Yield3.7%3.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -10.0%

Total return

-10.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

-13.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.