StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0258.KL$0.35+0.00%
Fair $0.35+0.0%

0258.KL

Agmo Holdings Berhad

Technology / Software - ApplicationKuala Lumpur

$0.35

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.35Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $453458.00 · quality 47.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0258.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Agmo Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$114M

P/E

17.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.8x

↓

ROE

11.7%

↑

Gross Margin

52.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0258.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.350Periodo -55.4%
Fair value: $0.350

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+13.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $38.0M · net income $6.7M · FCF $-1.0M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

52.0%+7.1% pts

Operating margin

35.1%+0.1% pts

Net margin

17.6%-9.3% pts

FCF margin

-2.7%-16.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$38.0M$38.0M$38.5M$35.2M$26.4M
Net Income$6.7M$6.7M$8.2M$7.8M$7.1M
EBITDA$12.8M$12.8M$13.5M$10.5M$8.0M
EPS——0.030.020.02
Gross Margin52.0%52.0%44.7%38.3%44.9%
Operating Margin35.1%35.1%32.4%24.5%34.9%
Net Margin17.6%17.6%21.3%22.1%26.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.020.030.02
Current Ratio7.597.59———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.0M$-1.0M$453458.00$3.2M$3.5M
Returns
ROE11.7%11.7%14.8%16.6%18.2%
Valuation
P/E17.5017.5014.8820.8331.75
EV/EBITDA6.816.818.7615.3825.92
P/B1.991.992.213.475.38
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-1.3%-1.3%9.3%33.6%—
EPS Growth——5.0%20.0%—
Dividend Yield8.6%8.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.7%

Total return

+0.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-7.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+8.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.