StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0271.KL$0.58+0.00%
Fair $0.58+0.0%

0271.KL

Wellspire Holdings Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Food DistributionKuala Lumpur

$0.58

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.58Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $6.0M · quality 72.3/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 66/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0271.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Wellspire Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$417M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

24.1x

↑

ROE

8.0%

↑

Gross Margin

27.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0271.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.585Periodo +36.0%
Fair value: $0.585

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.8%

FCF CAGR

+86.4%

FCF margin

5.6%

FCF / Net income

1.71x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $159.1M · net income $5.2M · FCF $8.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

27.6%+6.6% pts

Operating margin

8.4%+3.4% pts

Net margin

3.3%+2.3% pts

FCF margin

5.6%+4.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$159.1M$159.1M$143.9M$124.9M$123.4M
Net Income$5.2M$5.2M$8.3M$2.6M$1.1M
EBITDA$15.5M$15.5M$20.0M$8.6M$7.8M
EPS——0.010.000.00
Gross Margin27.6%27.6%28.4%19.9%21.0%
Operating Margin8.4%8.4%13.3%6.1%5.0%
Net Margin3.3%3.3%5.8%2.1%0.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.090.070.28
Current Ratio8.758.75———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$8.9M$8.9M$3.0M$6.0M$1.4M
Returns
ROE8.0%8.0%13.7%5.0%5.2%
Valuation
P/E——58.12181.08—
EV/EBITDA24.1124.1122.4150.93—
P/B6.456.458.018.99—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.6%10.6%15.2%1.2%—
EPS Growth——216.2%131.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -12.7%

Total return

-12.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-12.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-12.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.