StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0276.KL$0.67-0.75%
Fair $0.67+0.0%

0276.KL

Autocount Dotcom Berhad

Technology / Software - ApplicationKuala Lumpur

$0.67

-0.00 (-0.75%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.67Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 59/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $13.2M · quality 76.7/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 77/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

59/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0276.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Autocount Dotcom Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$366M

P/E

16.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.0x

↓

ROE

56.8%

↑

Gross Margin

82.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0276.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.665Periodo -11.3%
Fair value: $0.665

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+24.8%

FCF CAGR

+34.1%

FCF margin

46.9%

FCF / Net income

1.14x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $75.3M · net income $31.1M · FCF $35.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

82.9%+2.9% pts

Operating margin

53.9%+8.4% pts

Net margin

41.3%+5.3% pts

FCF margin

46.9%+9.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$75.3M$75.3M$60.6M$41.5M$38.7M
Net Income$31.1M$31.1M$19.7M$13.0M$13.9M
EBITDA$44.3M$44.3M$26.8M$18.5M$19.2M
EPS——0.040.030.03
Gross Margin82.9%82.9%71.5%74.7%79.9%
Operating Margin53.9%53.9%39.1%37.2%45.5%
Net Margin41.3%41.3%32.6%31.3%36.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.000.000.23
Current Ratio2.922.92———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$35.3M$35.3M$13.2M$10.3M$14.6M
Returns
ROE56.8%56.8%31.6%24.1%64.3%
Valuation
P/E16.6316.6335.2026.49—
EV/EBITDA7.967.9624.8116.90—
P/B6.696.6911.136.40—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth24.3%24.3%46.1%7.2%—
EPS Growth——42.6%-0.8%—
Dividend Yield6.8%6.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -32.2%

Total return

-32.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.04 → n/d

Residual

-39.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+6.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-39.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.