StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0290.KL$0.20+0.00%
Fair $0.20+0.0%

0290.KL

Panda Eco System Berhad

Technology / Software - ApplicationKuala Lumpur

$0.20

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.20Fund rank 38/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 56/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $8.5M · quality 80.3/100

Data gap 38/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 83/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

56/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0290.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Panda Eco System Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$135M

P/E

19.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.5x

↓

ROE

19.0%

↑

Gross Margin

43.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0290.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.195Periodo -25.0%
Fair value: $0.195

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+27.8%

FCF CAGR

+20.8%

FCF margin

22.5%

FCF / Net income

1.07x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $43.8M · net income $9.2M · FCF $9.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

43.6%-12.0% pts

Operating margin

26.2%-12.3% pts

Net margin

21.1%-12.5% pts

FCF margin

22.5%-4.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$43.8M$43.8M$31.2M$23.8M$21.0M
Net Income$9.2M$9.2M$8.1M$4.3M$7.0M
EBITDA$14.2M$14.2M$11.5M$6.5M$8.7M
EPS——0.010.010.01
Gross Margin43.6%43.6%55.2%54.4%55.5%
Operating Margin26.2%26.2%32.3%24.9%38.5%
Net Margin21.1%21.1%25.9%18.1%33.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.000.01
Current Ratio2.972.97———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$9.8M$9.8M$8.5M$3.8M$5.6M
Returns
ROE19.0%19.0%21.7%13.3%55.9%
Valuation
P/E19.5019.5031.2528.00—
EV/EBITDA8.528.5221.0217.68—
P/B2.772.776.773.71—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth40.5%40.5%31.1%13.3%—
EPS Growth——60.0%-28.6%—
Dividend Yield2.6%2.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -32.4%

Total return

-32.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-35.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-35.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.