StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0295.KL$1.02+0.00%
Fair $1.02+0.0%

0295.KL

Master Tec Group Berhad

Industrials / Electrical Equipment & PartsKuala Lumpur

$1.02

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.02Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $20.7M · quality 47.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0295.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Master Tec Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.0B

P/E

34.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

21.8x

↑

ROE

13.8%

↑

Gross Margin

12.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.46

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0295.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.020Periodo +183.3%
Fair value: $1.020

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.6%

FCF CAGR

+17.5%

FCF margin

5.0%

FCF / Net income

0.73x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $415.4M · net income $28.3M · FCF $20.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

12.9%+3.2% pts

Operating margin

9.3%+1.5% pts

Net margin

6.8%+1.4% pts

FCF margin

5.0%+1.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$415.4M$415.4M$324.0M$285.4M$362.7M
Net Income$28.3M$28.3M$27.0M$23.5M$19.6M
EBITDA$49.8M$49.8M$35.0M$40.7M$34.1M
EPS——0.030.020.02
Gross Margin12.9%12.9%10.9%15.4%9.7%
Operating Margin9.3%9.3%7.5%11.6%7.8%
Net Margin6.8%6.8%8.3%8.2%5.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.460.460.360.731.02
Current Ratio1.751.75———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$20.7M$20.7M$-15.9M$26.9M$12.8M
Returns
ROE13.8%13.8%14.7%21.4%22.7%
Valuation
P/E34.0034.0047.01——
EV/EBITDA21.7721.7737.75——
P/B5.085.086.93——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth28.2%28.2%13.5%-21.3%—
EPS Growth——16.3%20.2%—
Dividend Yield1.7%1.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -5.6%

Total return

-5.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-7.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.