StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0296.KL$0.47+1.08%
Fair $0.47+0.0%

0296.KL

HE Group Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.47

+0.00 (+1.08%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.47Fund rank 38/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 56/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $13.4M · quality 83.0/100

Data gap 38/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 79/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

56/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0296.KLLocal privado en este navegador · HE Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$207M

P/E

23.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.9x

↑

ROE

15.6%

↑

Gross Margin

21.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.04

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0296.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.470Periodo +44.6%
Fair value: $0.470

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.6%

FCF CAGR

-9.7%

FCF margin

5.1%

FCF / Net income

0.57x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $123.3M · net income $11.0M · FCF $6.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

21.1%+7.1% pts

Operating margin

12.7%+4.9% pts

Net margin

9.0%+3.2% pts

FCF margin

5.1%-2.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$123.3M$123.3M$206.9M$204.2M$107.6M
Net Income$11.0M$11.0M$13.7M$11.0M$6.2M
EBITDA$15.9M$15.9M$20.0M$15.7M$8.5M
EPS——0.030.020.01
Gross Margin21.1%21.1%15.2%12.0%13.9%
Operating Margin12.7%12.7%9.4%7.7%7.8%
Net Margin9.0%9.0%6.6%5.4%5.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.040.040.050.110.64
Current Ratio2.402.40———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$6.2M$6.2M$13.5M$13.4M$8.5M
Returns
ROE15.6%15.6%22.1%40.8%38.8%
Valuation
P/E23.5023.5017.73——
EV/EBITDA9.869.869.76——
P/B2.922.923.93——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-40.4%-40.4%1.3%89.8%—
EPS Growth——25.7%77.7%—
Dividend Yield3.1%3.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +91.1%

Total return

+91.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

+88.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+88.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.