StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0302.KL$0.45-3.23%
Fair $0.45+0.0%

0302.KL

Topmix Berhad

Consumer Cyclical / Furnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesKuala Lumpur

$0.45

-0.02 (-3.23%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.45Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.7M · quality 58.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0302.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Topmix Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$177M

P/E

9.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.2x

↓

ROE

20.4%

↑

Gross Margin

40.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.27

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0302.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.450Periodo +7.1%
Fair value: $0.450

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+17.2%

FCF CAGR

+16.8%

FCF margin

11.1%

FCF / Net income

0.67x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $105.9M · net income $17.6M · FCF $11.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.9%+5.2% pts

Operating margin

24.7%+5.1% pts

Net margin

16.6%+3.7% pts

FCF margin

11.1%-0.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$105.9M$105.9M$92.9M$72.7M$65.8M
Net Income$17.6M$17.6M$11.6M$8.4M$8.5M
EBITDA$28.3M$28.3M$19.3M$14.3M$13.9M
EPS——0.030.020.02
Gross Margin40.9%40.9%38.4%35.8%35.7%
Operating Margin24.7%24.7%19.4%18.1%19.6%
Net Margin16.6%16.6%12.5%11.5%13.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.270.270.390.680.83
Current Ratio5.675.67———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$11.8M$11.8M$-1.5M$3.7M$7.4M
Returns
ROE20.4%20.4%16.0%22.2%28.3%
Valuation
P/E9.009.0015.29——
EV/EBITDA6.246.2410.00——
P/B2.052.052.44——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth14.0%14.0%27.9%10.5%—
EPS Growth——47.4%-1.6%—
Dividend Yield2.2%2.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.1%

Total return

+16.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

+13.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+13.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.