StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0303.KL$0.25+0.00%
Fair $0.25+0.0%

0303.KL

0303.KL

Healthcare / Medical Care FacilitiesKuala Lumpur

$0.25

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.25Fund rank 39/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $50.2M · quality 81.3/100

Data gap 39/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 88/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0303.KLLocal privado en este navegador · 0303.KL
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.2B

P/E

25.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

14.5x

↑

ROE

29.0%

↑

Gross Margin

60.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0303.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.250Periodo -21.9%
Fair value: $0.250

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+24.7%

FCF CAGR

+11.9%

FCF margin

26.9%

FCF / Net income

0.83x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $176.8M · net income $57.5M · FCF $47.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

60.6%+9.5% pts

Operating margin

41.9%+7.6% pts

Net margin

32.5%+16.8% pts

FCF margin

26.9%-10.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$176.8M$176.8M$167.6M$137.5M$91.1M
Net Income$57.5M$57.5M$52.9M$53.2M$14.3M
EBITDA$83.0M$83.0M$79.1M$75.2M$39.3M
EPS——0.010.010.00
Gross Margin60.6%60.6%58.1%55.7%51.1%
Operating Margin41.9%41.9%43.5%40.5%34.3%
Net Margin32.5%32.5%31.6%38.7%15.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.090.450.75
Current Ratio3.223.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$47.6M$47.6M$50.2M$59.7M$33.9M
Returns
ROE29.0%29.0%28.2%103.2%35.4%
Valuation
P/E25.0025.0027.39——
EV/EBITDA14.5014.5019.26——
P/B6.146.148.17——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.5%5.5%21.9%50.9%—
EPS Growth——5.0%272.1%—
Dividend Yield4.0%4.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -6.7%

Total return

-6.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-10.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-10.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.