StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0304.KL$0.32+1.59%
Fair $0.32+0.0%

0304.KL

Farm Price Holdings Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Food DistributionKuala Lumpur

$0.32

+0.00 (+1.59%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.32Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.0M · quality 42.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0304.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Farm Price Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$144M

P/E

16.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

8.2x

↓

ROE

13.5%

↑

Gross Margin

23.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.35

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0304.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.320Periodo -22.0%
Fair value: $0.320

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.36x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $128.6M · net income $9.1M · FCF $-3.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

23.8%+7.4% pts

Operating margin

9.3%+2.9% pts

Net margin

7.1%+2.1% pts

FCF margin

-2.5%-1.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$128.6M$128.6M$123.0M$114.2M$94.4M
Net Income$9.1M$9.1M$10.3M$8.7M$4.7M
EBITDA$16.5M$16.5M$16.4M$14.0M$8.2M
EPS——0.030.020.01
Gross Margin23.8%23.8%22.3%20.2%16.3%
Operating Margin9.3%9.3%11.3%9.6%6.4%
Net Margin7.1%7.1%8.4%7.6%5.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.350.350.210.530.98
Current Ratio3.513.51———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.2M$-3.2M$6.4M$4.0M$-754000.00
Returns
ROE13.5%13.5%17.8%35.2%29.9%
Valuation
P/E16.0016.0016.50——
EV/EBITDA8.188.189.00——
P/B2.152.152.85——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.6%4.6%7.7%21.0%—
EPS Growth——55.1%83.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -36.6%

Total return

-36.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-36.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-36.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.