StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0362.KL$0.14+3.57%
Fair $0.14+0.0%

0362.KL

ASM Automation Group Berhad

Industrials / Specialty Industrial MachineryKuala Lumpur

$0.14

+0.00 (+3.57%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.14Fund rank 38/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 57/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.8M · quality 79.7/100

Data gap 38/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 81/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

57/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0362.KLLocal privado en este navegador · ASM Automation Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$78M

P/E

14.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.6x

↓

ROE

23.3%

↑

Gross Margin

32.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.07

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0362.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.145Periodo -12.1%
Fair value: $0.145

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+5.7%

FCF CAGR

-20.9%

FCF margin

12.2%

FCF / Net income

0.67x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $39.1M · net income $7.1M · FCF $4.8M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

32.7%+7.8% pts

Operating margin

21.3%+8.4% pts

Net margin

18.2%+8.5% pts

FCF margin

12.2%-9.6% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$39.1M$39.1M$35.8M$35.1M
Net Income$7.1M$7.1M$3.9M$3.4M
EBITDA$10.0M$10.0M$6.4M$5.0M
EPS0.010.010.010.01
Gross Margin32.7%32.7%27.2%25.0%
Operating Margin21.3%21.3%15.5%12.9%
Net Margin18.2%18.2%10.9%9.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.070.070.180.16
Current Ratio6.876.87——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.8M$4.8M$4.6M$7.6M
Returns
ROE23.3%23.3%14.3%12.3%
Valuation
P/E14.5014.50——
EV/EBITDA6.606.60——
P/B2.542.54——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.2%9.2%2.2%—
EPS Growth81.3%81.3%16.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-1.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.01

Spread vs growth

82.4%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

3.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

78.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

6.5%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

74.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -12.1%

Total return

-12.1%

Start / end P/E

22.5x → 10.9x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

-41.9%

EPS growth+81.3%
Multiple rerating-51.5%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-41.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.