StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0363.KL$0.20+0.00%
Fair $0.20+0.0%

0363.KL

PMCK Berhad

Healthcare / Medical Care FacilitiesKuala Lumpur

$0.20

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.20Fund rank 39/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $16.6M · quality 83.7/100

Data gap 39/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 89/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0363.KLLocal privado en este navegador · PMCK Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$213M

P/E

19.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.6x

↓

ROE

17.9%

↑

Gross Margin

33.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0363.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.195Periodo -15.2%
Fair value: $0.195

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.7%

FCF CAGR

-15.3%

FCF margin

11.5%

FCF / Net income

0.80x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $104.3M · net income $15.0M · FCF $12.0M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

33.3%+5.1% pts

Operating margin

18.9%+1.8% pts

Net margin

14.4%+2.5% pts

FCF margin

11.5%-5.7% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$104.3M$104.3M$99.9M$97.1M
Net Income$15.0M$15.0M$10.7M$11.5M
EBITDA$27.0M$27.0M$20.6M$22.4M
EPS0.010.010.010.01
Gross Margin33.3%33.3%36.3%28.2%
Operating Margin18.9%18.9%22.6%17.0%
Net Margin14.4%14.4%10.7%11.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.160.17
Current Ratio2.842.84——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$12.0M$12.0M$16.6M$16.7M
Returns
ROE17.9%17.9%13.2%14.0%
Valuation
P/E19.5019.50——
EV/EBITDA7.567.56——
P/B2.532.53——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.5%4.5%2.8%—
EPS Growth40.2%40.2%-7.1%—
Dividend Yield1.2%1.2%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

7.8%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

32.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

8.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

31.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

9.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

30.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -14.0%

Total return

-14.0%

Start / end P/E

23.4x → 14.1x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

-15.9%

EPS growth+40.2%
Multiple rerating-39.5%
Dividend+1.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-15.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.