StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0365.KL$0.17+0.00%
Fair $0.17+0.0%

0365.KL

A1 A.K. Koh Group Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsKuala Lumpur

$0.17

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.17Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $11.8M · quality 70.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 83/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0365.KLLocal privado en este navegador · A1 A.K. Koh Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$142M

P/E

17.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

8.4x

↓

ROE

34.0%

↑

Gross Margin

46.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.89

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0365.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.170Periodo -30.6%
Fair value: $0.170

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.5%

FCF CAGR

+13.9%

FCF margin

15.9%

FCF / Net income

1.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $96.1M · net income $11.9M · FCF $15.3M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

46.4%+0.0% pts

Operating margin

17.3%-2.7% pts

Net margin

12.4%-5.8% pts

FCF margin

15.9%+2.0% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$96.1M$96.1M$95.1M$84.8M
Net Income$11.9M$11.9M$11.8M$15.4M
EBITDA$19.3M$19.3M$18.1M$21.1M
EPS0.010.010.010.02
Gross Margin46.4%46.4%44.5%46.4%
Operating Margin17.3%17.3%16.0%20.0%
Net Margin12.4%12.4%12.4%18.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.890.890.690.87
Current Ratio2.572.57——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$15.3M$15.3M$10.0M$11.8M
Returns
ROE34.0%34.0%34.2%51.6%
Valuation
P/E17.0017.00——
EV/EBITDA8.438.43——
P/B4.094.09——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.0%1.0%12.2%—
EPS Growth0.7%0.7%-23.3%—
Dividend Yield2.1%2.1%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

2.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

-1.4%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

5.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

-4.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

7.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

-6.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -28.5%

Total return

-28.5%

Start / end P/E

17.4x → 12.0x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

-0.2%

EPS growth+0.7%
Multiple rerating-31.1%
Dividend+2.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.