StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0371.KL$0.07+0.00%
Fair $0.07+0.0%

0371.KL

Camaroe Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsKuala Lumpur

$0.07

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.07Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $677077.00 · quality 47.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -5.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 0371.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Camaroe Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$37M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-5.8%

↓

Gross Margin

14.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.49

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0371.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.075Periodo -50.0%
Fair value: $0.075

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-11.7%

FCF / Net income

1.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $33.1M · net income $-2.2M · FCF $-3.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

14.1%-18.1% pts

Operating margin

-6.6%-31.9% pts

Net margin

-6.7%-30.1% pts

FCF margin

-11.7%-27.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$33.1M$33.1M$39.8M$33.9M$36.0M
Net Income$-2.2M$-2.2M$8.1M$11.7M$8.5M
EBITDA$-121537.00$-121537.00$12.5M$14.5M$10.7M
EPS——0.020.020.02
Gross Margin14.1%14.1%32.7%33.3%32.2%
Operating Margin-6.6%-6.6%26.7%27.0%25.2%
Net Margin-6.7%-6.7%20.3%34.5%23.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.490.490.590.310.40
Current Ratio4.524.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.9M$-3.9M$7.4M$677077.00$5.5M
Returns
ROE-5.8%-5.8%29.5%52.5%50.9%
Valuation
P/B0.970.97———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-16.8%-16.8%17.4%-5.8%—
EPS Growth——-31.0%38.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -50.0%

Total return

-50.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

-50.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-50.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.