StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0372.KL$0.67+1.52%
Fair $0.67+0.0%

0372.KL

Cheeding Holdings Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.67

+0.01 (+1.52%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.67Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $23.1M · quality 64.7/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 55/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0372.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Cheeding Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$534M

P/E

16.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.9x

↓

ROE

26.0%

↑

Gross Margin

56.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0372.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.670Periodo -8.8%
Fair value: $0.670

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+44.2%

FCF CAGR

+287.7%

FCF margin

20.9%

FCF / Net income

0.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $110.7M · net income $35.3M · FCF $23.1M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

56.1%+7.6% pts

Operating margin

41.6%+10.5% pts

Net margin

31.9%+9.6% pts

FCF margin

20.9%+19.8% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$110.7M$110.7M$117.7M$88.2M$37.0M
Net Income$35.3M$35.3M$26.3M$20.5M$8.2M
EBITDA$50.3M$50.3M$37.1M$29.9M$12.8M
EPS——0.030.030.01
Gross Margin56.1%56.1%38.3%44.5%48.4%
Operating Margin41.6%41.6%29.2%31.0%31.1%
Net Margin31.9%31.9%22.4%23.2%22.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.100.14
Current Ratio5.845.84———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$23.1M$23.1M$38.6M$14.1M$397002.00
Returns
ROE26.0%26.0%27.3%48.1%30.4%
Valuation
P/E16.7516.75———
EV/EBITDA8.868.86———
P/B3.943.94———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-5.9%-5.9%33.5%138.6%—
EPS Growth——28.8%148.6%—
Dividend Yield3.4%3.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -5.5%

Total return

-5.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-8.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-8.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.