StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0382.KL$0.33+0.00%
Fair $0.33+0.0%

0382.KL

Foodie Media Berhad

Communication Services / PublishingKuala Lumpur

$0.33

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.33Fund rank 38/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $5.9M · quality 81.0/100

Data gap 38/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 85/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 0382.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Foodie Media Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$293M

P/E

33.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

26.4x

↑

ROE

86.5%

↑

Gross Margin

59.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.08

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

0382.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.330Periodo -17.5%
Fair value: $0.330

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+32.3%

FCF CAGR

+26.9%

FCF margin

39.8%

FCF / Net income

1.28x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $23.9M · net income $7.5M · FCF $9.5M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

59.4%-11.4% pts

Operating margin

44.4%-15.4% pts

Net margin

31.1%-13.6% pts

FCF margin

39.8%-3.4% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$23.9M$23.9M$16.8M$13.7M
Net Income$7.5M$7.5M$6.1M$6.1M
EBITDA$10.8M$10.8M$8.3M$8.0M
EPS0.010.010.010.01
Gross Margin59.4%59.4%61.3%70.8%
Operating Margin44.4%44.4%47.5%59.8%
Net Margin31.1%31.1%36.3%44.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.080.080.070.09
Current Ratio2.152.15——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$9.5M$9.5M$4.5M$5.9M
Returns
ROE86.5%86.5%85.1%121.9%
Valuation
P/E33.0033.00——
EV/EBITDA26.4126.41——
P/B34.0134.01——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth42.9%42.9%22.5%—
EPS Growth22.4%22.4%-0.5%—
Dividend Yield1.0%1.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

51.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

-29.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

33.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.04

Spread vs growth

-10.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

21.1%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.06

Spread vs growth

1.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -16.5%

Total return

-16.5%

Start / end P/E

58.4x → 39.3x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

-7.3%

EPS growth+22.4%
Multiple rerating-32.6%
Dividend+1.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.