StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0387.KL$0.18-2.70%
Fair $0.18+0.0%

0387.KL

Guan Huat Seng Holdings Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsKuala Lumpur

$0.18

-0.00 (-2.70%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.18Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-160000.00 · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0387.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Guan Huat Seng Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$85M

P/E

9.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.0x

↓

ROE

10.3%

↑

Gross Margin

25.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.31

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0387.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.180Periodo -26.5%
Fair value: $0.180

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+9.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.7%

FCF / Net income

0.35x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $93.1M · net income $7.2M · FCF $2.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.1%+9.0% pts

Operating margin

12.0%+4.2% pts

Net margin

7.8%+2.1% pts

FCF margin

2.7%+5.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$93.1M$93.1M$84.8M$81.3M$71.2M
Net Income$7.2M$7.2M$6.7M$4.3M$4.0M
EBITDA$12.3M$12.3M$10.4M$7.2M$6.5M
EPS——0.010.010.01
Gross Margin25.1%25.1%19.7%16.3%16.1%
Operating Margin12.0%12.0%9.4%7.5%7.8%
Net Margin7.8%7.8%7.9%5.3%5.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.310.310.660.320.40
Current Ratio3.813.81———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.5M$2.5M$-15.8M$-160000.00$-1.8M
Returns
ROE10.3%10.3%19.1%15.7%17.1%
Valuation
P/E9.009.00———
EV/EBITDA6.036.03———
P/B1.221.22———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.8%9.8%4.3%14.2%—
EPS Growth——54.8%8.8%—
Dividend Yield1.4%1.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -25.1%

Total return

-25.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-26.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-26.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.