StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0389.KL$0.13+4.00%
Fair $0.13+0.0%

0389.KL

One Gasmaster Holdings Berhad

Industrials / Industrial DistributionKuala Lumpur

$0.13

+0.00 (+4.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.13Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.2M · quality 43.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0389.KLLocal privado en este navegador · One Gasmaster Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$40M

P/E

13.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.2x

↓

ROE

35.1%

↑

Gross Margin

33.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.47

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0389.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.130Periodo -35.0%
Fair value: $0.130

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+28.9%

FCF CAGR

-58.2%

FCF margin

3.1%

FCF / Net income

0.21x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $38.0M · net income $5.6M · FCF $1.2M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

33.7%+1.5% pts

Operating margin

18.4%+2.7% pts

Net margin

14.6%+2.7% pts

FCF margin

3.1%-26.1% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$38.0M$38.0M$31.0M$22.9M
Net Income$5.6M$5.6M$4.1M$2.7M
EBITDA$8.8M$8.8M$6.8M$4.5M
EPS0.020.020.010.01
Gross Margin33.7%33.7%31.5%32.2%
Operating Margin18.4%18.4%17.7%15.7%
Net Margin14.6%14.6%13.1%12.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.470.470.710.44
Current Ratio3.963.96——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.2M$1.2M$-261000.00$6.7M
Returns
ROE35.1%35.1%36.0%22.4%
Valuation
P/E13.0013.00——
EV/EBITDA5.185.18——
P/B2.542.54——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth22.6%22.6%35.6%—
EPS Growth36.7%36.7%48.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-13.7%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.01

Spread vs growth

50.4%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-4.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.01

Spread vs growth

41.6%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

2.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

34.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -35.0%

Total return

-35.0%

Start / end P/E

15.2x → 7.2x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.02

Residual

-19.3%

EPS growth+36.7%
Multiple rerating-52.5%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-19.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.