StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0770.HK$0.20-4.81%
Fair $0.20+0.0%

0770.HK

Shanghai International Shanghai Growth Investment Limited

Unknown / UnknownHKSE

$0.20

-0.01 (-4.81%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.20Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 16/F
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-519108.00 · quality 46.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 29/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

16/100

F

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 0770.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Shanghai International Shanghai Growth Investment Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-116.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.43

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0770.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.198Periodo -95.7%
Fair value: $0.198

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

438.8%

FCF / Net income

1.83x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $-359554.0 · net income $-861291.0 · FCF $-1.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

239.5%+36.0% pts

FCF margin

438.8%+493.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$-359554.00$-359554.00$78566.00$-26754.00$-476866.00
Net Income$-861291.00$-861291.00$-357498.00$-455345.00$-970513.00
EPS-0.06-0.06-0.03-0.03-0.07
Net Margin239.5%239.5%-455.0%1702.0%203.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.430.43———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.6M$-1.6M$-52741.00$-519108.00$260200.00
Returns
ROE-116.3%-116.3%-29.8%-29.3%-48.3%
Valuation
P/B3.793.793.931.181.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-557.6%-557.6%393.7%94.4%—
EPS Growth-119.1%-119.1%20.4%53.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -48.6%

Total return

-48.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → -0.06

Residual

-48.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-48.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.