StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
079650.KQ$1025.00-1.91%
Fair $1025.00+0.0%

079650.KQ

Seosan Corporation

Unknown / UnknownKOSDAQ

$1025.00

-20.00 (-1.91%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1025.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 3/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.6B · quality 33.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

3/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 079650.KQLocal privado en este navegador · Seosan Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$20.5B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-1.4%

↓

Gross Margin

8.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1025
$980$1948

TradingView lightweight chart

079650.KQ price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,025Periodo +90.9%
Fair value: $1,025

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-6.8%

FCF / Net income

3.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $45.10B · net income $-985.0M · FCF $-3.05B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

8.6%-4.9% pts

Operating margin

-11.7%-10.7% pts

Net margin

-2.2%-4.6% pts

FCF margin

-6.8%-3.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$45.10B$45.10B$35.68B$41.25B$49.16B
Net Income$-985.0M$-985.0M$-476.0M$1.56B$1.19B
EBITDA$-623.4M$-623.4M$-59.0M$4.17B$4.81B
EPS-49.00-49.00-24.0078.0059.00
Gross Margin8.6%8.6%6.8%13.2%13.5%
Operating Margin-11.7%-11.7%-15.6%-3.8%-1.0%
Net Margin-2.2%-2.2%-1.3%3.8%2.4%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.05B$-3.05B$1.58B$3.77B$-1.82B
Returns
ROE-1.4%-1.4%-0.7%2.2%1.7%
Valuation
P/E———20.3332.29
EV/EBITDA———5.666.88
P/B0.290.290.350.450.56
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth26.4%26.4%-13.5%-16.1%—
EPS Growth-104.2%-104.2%-130.8%32.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -27.6%

Total return

-27.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-24.00 → -49.00

Residual

-27.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-27.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.