StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0979.HK$0.30-6.25%
Fair $0.30+0.0%

0979.HK

Green Energy Group Limited

Industrials / Waste ManagementHKSE

$0.30

-0.02 (-6.25%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.30Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-16.5M · quality 64.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -21.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 0979.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Green Energy Group Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$414M

P/E

1.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-21.8%

↓

Gross Margin

23.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.14

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0979.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.300Periodo +275.0%
Fair value: $0.305

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2023 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+15.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-20.6%

FCF / Net income

1.82x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $79.9M · net income $-9.0M · FCF $-16.5M

2021-FY → 2023-FY

Gross margin

23.8%+5.6% pts

Operating margin

-16.2%+30.7% pts

Net margin

-11.3%+23.8% pts

FCF margin

-20.6%+29.1% pts
MetricTTM
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$79.9M$79.9M$433.6M$60.3M
Net Income$-9.0M$-9.0M$-27.7M$-21.2M
EBITDA$-603000.00$-603000.00$-18.8M$-22.4M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.02
Gross Margin23.8%23.8%3.4%18.2%
Operating Margin-16.2%-16.2%-5.2%-46.9%
Net Margin-11.3%-11.3%-6.4%-35.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.140.140.070.01
Current Ratio1.901.90——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-16.5M$-16.5M$-8.8M$-30.0M
Returns
ROE-21.8%-21.8%-54.8%-26.2%
Valuation
P/E0.980.98——
P/B8.378.374.943.93
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-81.6%-81.6%619.6%—
EPS Growth67.6%67.6%-31.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +24.0%

Total return

+24.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.01

Residual

+24.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+24.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.