StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1400.HK$0.02+0.00%
Fair $0.02+0.0%

1400.HK

Moody Technology Holdings Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Textile ManufacturingHKSE

$0.02

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.02Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-13.1M · quality 28.3/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1400.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Moody Technology Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$72M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

1475.9%

↑

Gross Margin

9.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.78

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1400.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.019Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $0.019

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+14.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $134.4M · net income $244.5M · FCF $-6.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.7%+1.5% pts

Operating margin

-16.6%+16.8% pts

Net margin

181.9%+337.1% pts

FCF margin

-4.7%+9.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$134.4M$134.4M$112.7M$126.7M$90.5M
Net Income$244.5M$244.5M$-88.4M$-811.4M$-140.5M
EBITDA$-9.2M$-9.2M$-11.0M$-759.0M$-64.8M
EPS——-0.02-0.24-2.16
Gross Margin9.7%9.7%8.0%11.7%8.2%
Operating Margin-16.6%-16.6%-28.9%-18.1%-33.4%
Net Margin181.9%181.9%-78.4%-640.4%-155.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.781.78-0.54-1.29-0.92
Current Ratio1.331.33———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.3M$-6.3M$-13.1M$-121.6M$-13.1M
Returns
ROE1475.9%1475.9%38.3%510.8%12.0%
Valuation
P/B4.364.36———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth19.2%19.2%-11.0%39.9%—
EPS Growth——91.7%88.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.6%

Total return

+5.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → n/d

Residual

+5.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.