StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1552.HK$0.25+0.00%
Fair $0.25+0.0%

1552.HK

BHCC Holding Limited

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionHKSE

$0.25

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.25Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $20.9M · quality 37.3/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1552.HKLocal privado en este navegador · BHCC Holding Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$200M

P/E

3.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

14.6x

↑

ROE

15.3%

↑

Gross Margin

7.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.28

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1552.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.250Periodo -64.3%
Fair value: $0.250

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

10.3%

FCF / Net income

2.41x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $202.3M · net income $8.7M · FCF $20.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

7.6%+10.4% pts

Operating margin

5.2%+9.3% pts

Net margin

4.3%+8.6% pts

FCF margin

10.3%+12.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$202.3M$202.3M$192.3M$309.2M$205.3M
Net Income$8.7M$8.7M$9.0M$1.8M$-8.8M
EBITDA$13.5M$13.5M$12.0M$5.2M$-5.7M
EPS——0.010.00-0.01
Gross Margin7.6%7.6%4.1%1.7%-2.8%
Operating Margin5.2%5.2%1.6%0.5%-4.1%
Net Margin4.3%4.3%4.7%0.6%-4.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.281.281.610.320.40
Current Ratio2.082.08———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$20.9M$20.9M$-70.2M$32.2M$-4.3M
Returns
ROE15.3%15.3%18.6%4.6%-23.5%
Valuation
P/E3.573.5712.1458.18—
EV/EBITDA14.5814.588.9711.14—
P/B3.523.522.262.612.55
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.2%5.2%-37.8%50.6%—
EPS Growth——409.1%120.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +20.8%

Total return

+20.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

+20.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+20.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.