StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1676.HK$0.22+0.00%
Fair $0.22+0.0%

1676.HK

Gaodi Holdings Limited

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsHKSE

$0.22

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.22Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-80.7M · quality 68.3/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 48/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 1unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -39.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 1676.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Gaodi Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$58M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-39.1%

↓

Gross Margin

3.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

1676.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.222Periodo -98.3%
Fair value: $0.222

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2022 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+302.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-30.1%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $348.4M · net income $-103.5M · FCF $-104.9M

2021-FY → 2022-FY

Gross margin

3.1%-8.3% pts

Operating margin

-30.2%+36.7% pts

Net margin

-29.7%+82.9% pts

FCF margin

-30.1%+35.1% pts
MetricTTM
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$348.4M$348.4M$86.5M
Net Income$-103.5M$-103.5M$-97.4M
EBITDA$-103.8M$-103.8M$-77.0M
EPS-0.89-0.89-0.96
Gross Margin3.1%3.1%11.5%
Operating Margin-30.2%-30.2%-66.9%
Net Margin-29.7%-29.7%-112.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.07
Current Ratio2.672.67—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-104.9M$-104.9M$-56.4M
Returns
ROE-39.1%-39.1%-27.1%
Valuation
P/B0.100.100.34
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth302.8%302.8%—
EPS Growth8.0%8.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -45.9%

Total return

-45.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.96 → -0.89

Residual

-45.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-45.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.