StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1701.HK$0.09+3.61%
Fair $0.09+0.0%

1701.HK

Tu Yi Holding Company Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Travel ServicesHKSE

$0.09

+0.00 (+3.61%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.09Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $5.7M · quality 46.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1701.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Tu Yi Holding Company Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$86M

P/E

8.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.7x

↓

ROE

5.8%

↑

Gross Margin

21.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.35

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1701.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.086Periodo -69.3%
Fair value: $0.086

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+129.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

1.8%

FCF / Net income

0.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $317.1M · net income $8.5M · FCF $5.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

21.3%-6.8% pts

Operating margin

1.5%+38.5% pts

Net margin

2.7%+72.9% pts

FCF margin

1.8%+46.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$317.1M$317.1M$213.8M$92.6M$26.3M
Net Income$8.5M$8.5M$9.9M$8.9M$-18.5M
EBITDA$36.4M$36.4M$17.3M$18.1M$-11.8M
EPS——0.010.01-0.02
Gross Margin21.3%21.3%23.6%36.3%28.2%
Operating Margin1.5%1.5%5.0%6.1%-36.9%
Net Margin2.7%2.7%4.6%9.6%-70.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.350.350.340.440.49
Current Ratio1.661.66———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.7M$5.7M$2.5M$11.8M$-11.8M
Returns
ROE5.8%5.8%7.0%6.7%-14.6%
Valuation
P/E8.608.6012.9316.85—
EV/EBITDA2.702.707.839.39—
P/B0.580.580.911.132.14
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth48.3%48.3%130.7%252.4%—
EPS Growth——11.2%148.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -24.6%

Total return

-24.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

-24.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-24.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.