StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1742.HK$0.19-0.53%
Fair $0.19+0.0%

1742.HK

HPC Holdings Limited

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionHKSE

$0.19

-0.00 (-0.53%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.19Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 62/B
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $24.5M · quality 55.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

62/100

B

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1742.HKLocal privado en este navegador · HPC Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$301M

P/E

1.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.5x

↓

ROE

32.2%

↑

Gross Margin

7.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.12

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1742.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.188Periodo -53.6%
Fair value: $0.188

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

13.1%

FCF / Net income

1.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $283.2M · net income $35.9M · FCF $37.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

7.3%+1.3% pts

Operating margin

2.9%-1.1% pts

Net margin

12.7%+12.8% pts

FCF margin

13.1%+23.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$283.2M$283.2M$169.8M$289.2M$202.9M
Net Income$35.9M$35.9M$-8.5M$3.4M$-166000.00
EBITDA$42.9M$42.9M$-6.9M$6.3M$-1.1M
EPS——-0.010.00-0.00
Gross Margin7.3%7.3%-3.0%4.5%6.0%
Operating Margin2.9%2.9%-6.2%2.8%3.9%
Net Margin12.7%12.7%-5.0%1.2%-0.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.120.120.190.210.23
Current Ratio1.521.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$37.2M$37.2M$5.6M$24.5M$-20.3M
Returns
ROE32.2%32.2%-11.2%3.9%-0.2%
Valuation
P/E1.341.34—17.62—
EV/EBITDA5.475.47—5.12—
P/B2.692.691.200.671.04
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth66.8%66.8%-41.3%42.5%—
EPS Growth——-352.4%2200.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +283.7%

Total return

+283.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

+283.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+283.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.