StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1D0.SI$0.41+1.23%
Fair $0.41+0.0%

1D0.SI

Kimly Limited

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsSES

$0.41

+0.00 (+1.23%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.41Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $82.0M · quality 73.7/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 88/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 1D0.SILocal privado en este navegador · Kimly Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$510M

P/E

2.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.9x

↓

ROE

17.3%

↑

Gross Margin

29.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.77

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1D0.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.410Periodo -19.6%
Fair value: $0.410

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.5%

FCF CAGR

-12.3%

FCF margin

17.2%

FCF / Net income

1.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $322.1M · net income $33.3M · FCF $55.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

29.2%+0.4% pts

Operating margin

14.4%-0.2% pts

Net margin

10.3%-0.4% pts

FCF margin

17.2%-8.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$322.1M$322.1M$319.4M$313.9M$317.7M
Net Income$33.3M$33.3M$33.1M$36.5M$34.0M
EBITDA$99.5M$99.5M$94.0M$96.3M$96.2M
EPS——0.030.030.03
Gross Margin29.2%29.2%28.4%28.3%28.8%
Operating Margin14.4%14.4%13.5%14.6%14.6%
Net Margin10.3%10.3%10.4%11.6%10.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.770.770.830.530.80
Current Ratio0.930.93———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$55.3M$55.3M$82.0M$83.4M$82.1M
Returns
ROE17.3%17.3%18.1%20.7%21.1%
Valuation
P/E2.732.7312.0310.5812.41
EV/EBITDA5.935.934.804.064.92
P/B2.652.652.172.192.61
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.9%0.9%1.8%-1.2%—
EPS Growth——-9.2%6.9%—
Dividend Yield4.9%4.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +31.1%

Total return

+31.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

+26.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+26.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.