StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1F2.SI$0.45-1.10%
Fair $0.45+0.0%

1F2.SI

Union Gas Holdings Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Specialty RetailSES

$0.45

-0.01 (-1.10%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.45Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 60/B
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $13.6M · quality 73.0/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 70/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

60/100

B

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1F2.SILocal privado en este navegador · Union Gas Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$143M

P/E

15.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.1x

↓

ROE

13.5%

↑

Gross Margin

35.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.65

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

1F2.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.450Periodo +55.2%
Fair value: $0.450

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.8%

FCF CAGR

+43.6%

FCF margin

11.0%

FCF / Net income

1.44x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $137.9M · net income $10.5M · FCF $15.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

35.0%+8.9% pts

Operating margin

9.3%+5.9% pts

Net margin

7.6%+3.8% pts

FCF margin

11.0%+7.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$137.9M$137.9M$125.5M$128.9M$134.8M
Net Income$10.5M$10.5M$12.5M$12.2M$5.2M
EBITDA$29.2M$29.2M$29.0M$27.8M$15.2M
EPS——0.040.040.02
Gross Margin35.0%35.0%37.8%37.9%26.1%
Operating Margin9.3%9.3%11.9%12.0%3.4%
Net Margin7.6%7.6%10.0%9.5%3.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.650.650.430.560.82
Current Ratio1.231.23———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$15.2M$15.2M$10.8M$13.6M$5.1M
Returns
ROE13.5%13.5%16.1%17.8%9.0%
Valuation
P/E15.0015.008.4010.3930.49
EV/EBITDA6.116.114.315.4812.79
P/B1.831.831.351.852.73
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.9%9.9%-2.6%-4.4%—
EPS Growth——2.1%134.8%—
Dividend Yield3.3%3.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +41.7%

Total return

+41.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.04 → n/d

Residual

+38.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+38.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.