StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1V3.SI$0.17+17.99%
Fair $0.17+0.0%

1V3.SI

Mooreast Holdings Ltd.

Industrials / Aerospace & DefenseSES

$0.17

+0.03 (+17.99%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.17Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 55/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.6M · quality 40.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

55/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1V3.SILocal privado en este navegador · Mooreast Holdings Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$43M

P/E

16.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

6.6x

↓

ROE

16.1%

↑

Gross Margin

44.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.73

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1V3.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.164Periodo -33.1%
Fair value: $0.165

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.2%

FCF CAGR

+50.8%

FCF margin

14.8%

FCF / Net income

1.56x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $38.3M · net income $3.6M · FCF $5.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

44.8%+5.8% pts

Operating margin

15.6%+8.6% pts

Net margin

9.5%+4.6% pts

FCF margin

14.8%+8.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$38.3M$38.3M$25.1M$28.7M$27.8M
Net Income$3.6M$3.6M$-2.3M$-1.8M$1.4M
EBITDA$9.6M$9.6M$3.3M$3.8M$7.0M
EPS——-0.01-0.010.01
Gross Margin44.8%44.8%39.8%36.4%39.0%
Operating Margin15.6%15.6%-5.0%-1.5%7.0%
Net Margin9.5%9.5%-9.2%-6.4%4.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.731.732.081.901.81
Current Ratio2.472.47———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.7M$5.7M$1.6M$-390212.00$1.7M
Returns
ROE16.1%16.1%-12.1%-8.6%5.9%
Valuation
P/E16.5016.50——32.40
EV/EBITDA6.616.6115.7416.519.63
P/B1.891.891.491.811.93
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth52.9%52.9%-12.6%3.1%—
EPS Growth——-25.4%-242.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +51.9%

Total return

+51.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

+51.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+51.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.