StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
220A.T$952.00+0.00%
Fair $952.00+0.0%

220A.T

220A.T

Technology / Software - ApplicationTokyo

$952.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $952.00Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $222.1M · quality 66.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 85/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 220A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 220A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.6B

P/E

11.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.3x

↓

ROE

11.1%

↑

Gross Margin

69.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$952
$944$1414

TradingView lightweight chart

220A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $952.00Periodo -18.1%
Fair value: $952.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.7%

FCF CAGR

+3.9%

FCF margin

8.0%

FCF / Net income

0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.56B · net income $263.9M · FCF $204.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

69.3%-0.8% pts

Operating margin

14.7%-0.9% pts

Net margin

10.3%-0.1% pts

FCF margin

8.0%-1.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.56B$2.56B$2.32B$2.18B$2.00B
Net Income$263.9M$263.9M$219.3M$214.2M$208.1M
EBITDA$384.6M$384.6M$337.0M$310.8M$312.8M
EPS——89.3478.7676.50
Gross Margin69.3%69.3%68.4%67.6%70.0%
Operating Margin14.7%14.7%14.4%14.1%15.6%
Net Margin10.3%10.3%9.5%9.8%10.4%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio4.644.64———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$204.8M$204.8M$222.1M$251.6M$182.6M
Returns
ROE11.1%11.1%10.4%13.4%15.1%
Valuation
P/E11.1511.1510.44——
EV/EBITDA1.261.26-0.03——
P/B1.101.101.09——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.5%10.5%6.1%9.4%—
EPS Growth——13.4%3.0%—
Dividend Yield3.1%3.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -9.8%

Total return

-9.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

89.34 → n/d

Residual

-13.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.