StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
2283.KL$0.05+11.11%
Fair $0.05+0.0%

2283.KL

Zelan Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.05

+0.00 (+11.11%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.05Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $51.9M · quality 72.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 74/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 2283.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Zelan Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$42M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

42.6%

↑

Gross Margin

65.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

-2.43

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

2283.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.050Periodo -98.1%
Fair value: $0.050

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-16.9%

FCF CAGR

+5.6%

FCF margin

164.8%

FCF / Net income

-0.81x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $29.0M · net income $-58.8M · FCF $47.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

65.7%+5.9% pts

Operating margin

38.8%-25.4% pts

Net margin

-203.0%-205.7% pts

FCF margin

164.8%+84.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$29.0M$29.0M$40.2M$30.3M$50.4M
Net Income$-58.8M$-58.8M$-252.2M$65.4M$1.4M
EBITDA$-38.6M$-38.6M$-224.2M$90.4M$60.3M
EPS——-0.300.080.00
Gross Margin65.7%65.7%49.4%59.1%59.8%
Operating Margin38.8%38.8%35.1%38.3%64.2%
Net Margin-203.0%-203.0%-627.7%215.5%2.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.43-2.43-3.972.635.00
Current Ratio0.260.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$47.7M$47.7M$51.9M$58.9M$40.5M
Returns
ROE42.6%42.6%266.8%41.9%1.4%
Valuation
P/E———0.9040.62
EV/EBITDA———5.108.87
P/B———0.380.57
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-27.9%-27.9%32.5%-39.8%—
EPS Growth——-485.7%4737.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +11.1%

Total return

+11.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.30 → n/d

Residual

+11.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+11.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.