StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
228A.T$1888.00+7.58%
Fair $1888.00+0.0%

228A.T

228A.T

Technology / Software - InfrastructureTokyo

$1888.00

+121.00 (+7.58%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1888.00Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 53/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $311.8M · quality 64.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 83/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

53/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 228A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 228A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4.4B

P/E

18.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.3x

↓

ROE

18.2%

↑

Gross Margin

54.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1888
$1212$2897

TradingView lightweight chart

228A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,718Periodo +7.3%
Fair value: $1,888

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+25.5%

FCF CAGR

+4.6%

FCF margin

12.2%

FCF / Net income

1.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.55B · net income $241.2M · FCF $311.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

54.2%+1.2% pts

Operating margin

13.0%+2.7% pts

Net margin

9.4%+1.7% pts

FCF margin

12.2%-8.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.55B$2.55B$2.10B$1.62B$1.29B
Net Income$241.2M$241.2M$150.9M$95.8M$99.9M
EBITDA$377.9M$377.9M$245.2M$134.6M$133.4M
EPS——79.1658.4245.29
Gross Margin54.2%54.2%49.3%49.5%53.0%
Operating Margin13.0%13.0%10.2%6.9%10.3%
Net Margin9.4%9.4%7.2%5.9%7.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity————0.90
Current Ratio1.661.66———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$311.8M$311.8M$369.2M$170.3M$272.1M
Returns
ROE18.2%18.2%14.0%60.9%162.6%
Valuation
P/E18.6618.6616.61——
EV/EBITDA9.319.313.02——
P/B3.323.322.32——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth21.3%21.3%30.1%25.4%—
EPS Growth——35.5%29.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +39.9%

Total return

+39.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

79.16 → n/d

Residual

+39.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+39.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.