StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
2301.T$1537.00-2.32%
Fair $1537.00+0.0%

2301.T

Gakujo Co., Ltd.

Industrials / Staffing & Employment ServicesTokyo

$1537.00

-37.00 (-2.32%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1537.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.4B · quality 59.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 76/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 2301.TLocal privado en este navegador · Gakujo Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$20.6B

P/E

11.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.7x

↓

ROE

12.7%

↑

Gross Margin

65.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1537
$1550$1948

TradingView lightweight chart

2301.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,559Periodo -15.6%
Fair value: $1,537

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+17.6%

FCF CAGR

+1.7%

FCF margin

13.0%

FCF / Net income

0.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $11.02B · net income $1.89B · FCF $1.43B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

65.2%-1.3% pts

Operating margin

21.2%-2.8% pts

Net margin

17.2%-3.5% pts

FCF margin

13.0%-7.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$11.02B$11.02B$10.73B$8.78B$6.77B
Net Income$1.89B$1.89B$2.23B$1.75B$1.40B
EBITDA$2.63B$2.63B$2.87B$2.46B$1.75B
EPS——160.77125.5299.11
Gross Margin65.2%65.2%66.4%66.8%66.5%
Operating Margin21.2%21.2%24.8%26.3%23.9%
Net Margin17.2%17.2%20.8%20.0%20.6%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio6.226.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.43B$1.43B$938.6M$2.04B$1.36B
Returns
ROE12.7%12.7%15.4%13.2%11.4%
Valuation
P/E11.0011.0010.6814.3615.09
EV/EBITDA5.695.696.488.459.48
P/B1.391.391.621.901.72
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.7%2.7%22.2%29.7%—
EPS Growth——28.1%26.6%—
Dividend Yield4.8%4.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -2.7%

Total return

-2.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

160.77 → n/d

Residual

-7.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.