StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
2325.T$4900.00-1.90%
Fair $4900.00+0.0%

2325.T

NJS Co., Ltd.

Industrials / Waste ManagementTokyo

$4900.00

-95.00 (-1.90%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4900.00Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 56/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 22% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.4B · quality 80.0/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 80/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

56/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 2325.TLocal privado en este navegador · NJS Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$46.7B

P/E

21.4x

↑

EV/EBITDA

7.8x

↓

ROE

7.7%

↑

Gross Margin

40.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$4900
$4315$6750

TradingView lightweight chart

2325.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4,900Periodo +512.5%
Fair value: $4,900

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.9%

FCF CAGR

+14.1%

FCF margin

5.7%

FCF / Net income

0.65x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $24.85B · net income $2.18B · FCF $1.41B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.6%+1.5% pts

Operating margin

13.1%+3.1% pts

Net margin

8.8%-0.2% pts

FCF margin

5.7%+0.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$24.85B$24.85B$22.59B$22.03B$19.23B
Net Income$2.18B$2.18B$2.12B$2.00B$1.73B
EBITDA$3.71B$3.71B$3.53B$3.24B$2.83B
EPS———209.33181.03
Gross Margin40.6%40.6%41.3%32.9%39.1%
Operating Margin13.1%13.1%13.2%7.3%10.1%
Net Margin8.8%8.8%9.4%9.1%9.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.00—0.00
Current Ratio3.713.71———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.41B$1.41B$1.41B$1.05B$951.1M
Returns
ROE7.7%7.7%8.1%8.2%7.5%
Valuation
P/E21.3721.37—13.1411.28
EV/EBITDA7.767.764.642.801.94
P/B1.641.641.301.070.85
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.0%10.0%2.6%14.5%—
EPS Growth———15.6%—
Dividend Yield2.2%2.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +10.6%

Total return

+10.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+8.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+8.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.