StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
235980.KQ$3430.00-2.83%
Fair $3430.00+0.0%

235980.KQ

MedPacto, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyKOSDAQ

$3430.00

-100.00 (-2.83%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3430.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 15/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-16.9B · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

15/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -27.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 235980.KQLocal privado en este navegador · MedPacto, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$117.6B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-27.9%

↓

Gross Margin

9.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.04

↓
52-Week Range$3430
$3220$8650

TradingView lightweight chart

235980.KQ price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3,430Periodo -77.6%
Fair value: $3,430

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-349.7%

FCF / Net income

1.06x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.90B · net income $-12.81B · FCF $-13.63B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.9%— pts

Operating margin

-359.6%— pts

Net margin

-328.6%— pts

FCF margin

-349.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.90B$3.90B———
Net Income$-12.81B$-12.81B$-20.14B$-35.32B$-35.75B
EBITDA$-11.54B$-11.54B$-18.51B$-33.00B$-24.27B
EPS-374.00-374.00-598.00-1665.00-917.86
Gross Margin9.9%9.9%———
Operating Margin-359.6%-359.6%———
Net Margin-328.6%-328.6%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.040.040.030.031.96
Current Ratio26.5426.54———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-13.63B$-13.63B$-16.88B$-26.47B$-30.54B
Returns
ROE-27.9%-27.9%-34.9%-49.8%-110.6%
Valuation
P/B2.562.562.701.9514.43
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth37.5%37.5%64.1%-81.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.9%

Total return

+0.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-598.00 → -374.00

Residual

+0.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.