StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
248A.T$885.00-2.87%
Fair $885.00+0.0%

248A.T

KIDS STAR Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationTokyo

$885.00

-26.00 (-2.87%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $885.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $143.7M · quality 54.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 65/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 248A.TLocal privado en este navegador · KIDS STAR Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

14.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

-0.1x

↓

ROE

6.7%

↑

Gross Margin

61.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$885
$865$2330

TradingView lightweight chart

248A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $879.00Periodo -61.8%
Fair value: $885.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+27.0%

FCF CAGR

+26.2%

FCF margin

12.4%

FCF / Net income

0.91x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.16B · net income $158.0M · FCF $143.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

61.8%+0.7% pts

Operating margin

21.5%+3.0% pts

Net margin

13.7%+0.3% pts

FCF margin

12.4%-0.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.16B$1.16B$908.2M$764.8M$564.5M
Net Income$158.0M$158.0M$104.9M$109.7M$75.5M
EBITDA$415.0M$415.0M$280.6M$258.5M$186.2M
EPS——50.3743.8830.18
Gross Margin61.8%61.8%62.3%62.1%61.1%
Operating Margin21.5%21.5%18.6%20.6%18.4%
Net Margin13.7%13.7%11.6%14.3%13.4%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio5.455.45———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$143.7M$143.7M$31.1M$179.0M$71.4M
Returns
ROE6.7%6.7%4.8%26.3%24.6%
Valuation
P/E14.5914.5931.35——
EV/EBITDA-0.10-0.103.99——
P/B0.970.971.51——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth27.4%27.4%18.7%35.5%—
EPS Growth——14.8%45.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -36.3%

Total return

-36.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

50.37 → n/d

Residual

-36.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-36.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.