StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
2497.HK$0.79-7.06%
Fair $0.79+0.0%

2497.HK

Fujing Holdings Co., Limited

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsHKSE

$0.79

-0.06 (-7.06%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.79Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 59/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $31.5M · quality 50.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

59/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 2497.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Fujing Holdings Co., Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$395M

P/E

5.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.6x

↓

ROE

11.7%

↑

Gross Margin

44.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.27

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

2497.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.790Periodo -46.6%
Fair value: $0.790

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+14.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-38.4%

FCF / Net income

-1.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $191.0M · net income $63.4M · FCF $-73.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

44.2%+2.8% pts

Operating margin

34.9%+5.1% pts

Net margin

33.2%+8.1% pts

FCF margin

-38.4%-76.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$191.0M$191.0M$182.2M$157.9M$126.7M
Net Income$63.4M$63.4M$51.8M$49.2M$31.8M
EBITDA$81.3M$81.3M$65.8M$61.7M$43.8M
EPS——0.110.100.06
Gross Margin44.2%44.2%42.4%43.4%41.5%
Operating Margin34.9%34.9%33.1%37.2%29.8%
Net Margin33.2%33.2%28.4%31.2%25.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.270.270.090.060.07
Current Ratio2.012.01———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-73.4M$-73.4M$31.6M$31.5M$48.7M
Returns
ROE11.7%11.7%10.8%14.5%11.0%
Valuation
P/E5.275.277.73——
EV/EBITDA3.593.593.39——
P/B0.730.730.85——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.8%4.8%15.4%24.6%—
EPS Growth——11.7%54.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -11.2%

Total return

-11.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.11 → n/d

Residual

-11.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-11.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.