StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
2798.T$2987.00-0.03%
Fair $2987.00+0.0%

2798.T

Y's Table Corporation

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsTokyo

$2987.00

-1.00 (-0.03%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2987.00Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $33.8M · quality 27.3/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 2798.TLocal privado en este navegador · Y's Table Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$9.9B

P/E

48.1x

↑

EV/EBITDA

19.9x

↑

ROE

23.2%

↑

Gross Margin

21.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.88

↑
52-Week Range$2987
$2861$3030

TradingView lightweight chart

2798.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2,987Periodo +34.5%
Fair value: $2,987

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.1%

FCF CAGR

-49.7%

FCF margin

0.3%

FCF / Net income

0.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.05B · net income $205.2M · FCF $33.8M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

21.7%+6.1% pts

Operating margin

1.9%+5.8% pts

Net margin

1.6%+2.3% pts

FCF margin

0.3%-2.5% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$13.05B$13.05B$12.12B$11.28B$9.78B
Net Income$205.2M$205.2M$260.6M$113.9M$-72.4M
EBITDA$501.0M$501.0M$438.3M$289.9M$107.5M
EPS———34.53-23.77
Gross Margin21.7%21.7%19.9%20.0%15.6%
Operating Margin1.9%1.9%1.0%1.6%-3.9%
Net Margin1.6%1.6%2.2%1.0%-0.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.881.882.514.628.07
Current Ratio1.521.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$33.8M$33.8M$-24.4M$128.2M$266.6M
Returns
ROE23.2%23.2%38.4%27.3%-23.8%
Valuation
P/E48.0648.06—76.46—
EV/EBITDA19.9119.9122.0230.5057.63
P/B11.1511.1513.9820.8519.06
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.6%7.6%7.4%15.4%—
EPS Growth———245.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2.2%

Total return

+2.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+2.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.