StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
286A.T$666.00-3.53%
Fair $666.00+0.0%

286A.T

286A.T

Healthcare / Medical Care FacilitiesTokyo

$666.00

-24.00 (-3.53%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $666.00Fund rank 20/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.8B · quality 25.7/100

Data gap 20/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 9/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 286A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 286A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$23.8B

P/E

8.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.6x

↓

ROE

13.5%

↑

Gross Margin

42.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.43

↑
52-Week Range$666
$653$1215

TradingView lightweight chart

286A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $656.00Periodo -33.1%
Fair value: $666.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+14.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-11.3%

FCF / Net income

-1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $24.73B · net income $2.78B · FCF $-2.80B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

42.6%+7.6% pts

Operating margin

9.6%+4.4% pts

Net margin

11.2%+5.3% pts

FCF margin

-11.3%-21.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$24.73B$24.73B$19.83B$18.05B$16.62B
Net Income$2.78B$2.78B$2.03B$1.05B$980.4M
EBITDA$4.60B$4.60B$4.45B$2.90B$2.67B
EPS——63.1235.1827.82
Gross Margin42.6%42.6%43.8%39.4%35.0%
Operating Margin9.6%9.6%11.6%10.5%5.2%
Net Margin11.2%11.2%10.2%5.8%5.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.431.431.522.482.11
Current Ratio2.152.15———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.80B$-2.80B$-52.6M$-5.25B$1.74B
Returns
ROE13.5%13.5%11.3%9.7%10.1%
Valuation
P/E8.688.6814.73——
EV/EBITDA9.589.5810.31——
P/B1.161.161.66——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth24.7%24.7%9.9%8.7%—
EPS Growth——79.4%26.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -40.9%

Total return

-40.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

63.12 → n/d

Residual

-40.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-40.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.