StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
330A.T$439.00+0.45%
Fair $439.00+0.0%

330A.T

330A.T

Industrials / Staffing & Employment ServicesTokyo

$439.00

+2.00 (+0.45%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $439.00Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $142.1M · quality 71.0/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 63/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 330A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 330A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.5B

P/E

10.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.2x

↓

ROE

79.4%

↑

Gross Margin

83.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$439
$413$1980

TradingView lightweight chart

330A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $447.00Periodo -54.8%
Fair value: $439.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+40.4%

FCF CAGR

+187.2%

FCF margin

30.2%

FCF / Net income

1.18x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.43B · net income $366.7M · FCF $433.2M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

83.4%+11.9% pts

Operating margin

20.5%+33.5% pts

Net margin

25.6%+38.5% pts

FCF margin

30.2%+23.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.43B$1.43B$1.06B$727.2M
Net Income$366.7M$366.7M$27.0M$-93.7M
EBITDA$297.3M$297.3M$60.1M$-41.7M
EPS65.7465.744.94-17.18
Gross Margin83.4%83.4%81.2%71.5%
Operating Margin20.5%20.5%2.6%-13.0%
Net Margin25.6%25.6%2.5%-12.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.611.70
Current Ratio1.801.80——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$433.2M$433.2M$142.1M$52.5M
Returns
ROE79.4%79.4%44.5%-278.4%
Valuation
P/E10.1210.12——
EV/EBITDA5.225.22——
P/B5.305.30——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth34.9%34.9%46.2%—
EPS Growth1230.9%1230.9%128.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-16.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$38.95

Spread vs growth

1246.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-6.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$47.13

Spread vs growth

1237.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

1.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$75.91

Spread vs growth

1229.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -75.8%

Total return

-75.8%

Start / end P/E

374.1x → 6.8x

EPS bridge

4.94 → 65.74

Residual

-1208.5%

EPS growth+1230.9%
Multiple rerating-98.2%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1208.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.