StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
332A.T$1055.00-2.31%
Fair $1055.00+0.0%

332A.T

332A.T

Technology / Software - ApplicationTokyo

$1055.00

-25.00 (-2.31%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1055.00Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 58/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $580.0M · quality 77.3/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 73/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

58/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 332A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 332A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$12.1B

P/E

15.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.0x

↓

ROE

12.6%

↑

Gross Margin

36.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$1055
$757$1765

TradingView lightweight chart

332A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,055Periodo +33.5%
Fair value: $1,055

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.0%

FCF CAGR

-5.8%

FCF margin

9.7%

FCF / Net income

0.92x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $5.97B · net income $633.5M · FCF $580.0M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

36.1%+5.6% pts

Operating margin

15.6%+1.9% pts

Net margin

10.6%+1.7% pts

FCF margin

9.7%-1.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$5.97B$5.97B$5.38B$5.98B
Net Income$633.5M$633.5M$542.8M$535.0M
EBITDA$1.09B$1.09B$902.7M$928.8M
EPS57.5457.5455.8446.98
Gross Margin36.1%36.1%31.5%30.5%
Operating Margin15.6%15.6%14.6%13.7%
Net Margin10.6%10.6%10.1%9.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.040.03
Current Ratio3.563.56——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$580.0M$580.0M$275.4M$654.1M
Returns
ROE12.6%12.6%17.4%20.8%
Valuation
P/E15.4615.46——
EV/EBITDA7.057.05——
P/B2.302.30——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.1%11.1%-10.0%—
EPS Growth3.0%3.0%18.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

17.6%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$93.61

Spread vs growth

-14.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

14.5%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$113.27

Spread vs growth

-11.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

12.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$182.43

Spread vs growth

-9.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +20.6%

Total return

+20.6%

Start / end P/E

15.7x → 18.3x

EPS bridge

55.84 → 57.54

Residual

+0.5%

EPS growth+3.0%
Multiple rerating+17.0%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.