StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
334A.T$895.00+1.94%
Fair $895.00+0.0%

334A.T

334A.T

Technology / Software - ApplicationTokyo

$895.00

+17.00 (+1.94%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $895.00Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $179.6M · quality 60.7/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 74/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 334A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 334A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3.0B

P/E

16.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

0.8x

↓

ROE

13.7%

↑

Gross Margin

62.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$895
$688$1270

TradingView lightweight chart

334A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $895.00Periodo -23.7%
Fair value: $895.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+14.7%

FCF CAGR

+40.4%

FCF margin

16.6%

FCF / Net income

1.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.37B · net income $176.7M · FCF $227.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

62.0%-3.2% pts

Operating margin

18.9%+6.9% pts

Net margin

12.9%+4.7% pts

FCF margin

16.6%+7.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.37B$1.37B$1.21B$1.06B$911.6M
Net Income$176.7M$176.7M$122.3M$90.0M$74.8M
EBITDA$287.3M$287.3M$227.8M$180.0M$142.9M
EPS——43.6927.2022.60
Gross Margin62.0%62.0%58.9%59.1%65.1%
Operating Margin18.9%18.9%15.2%13.2%12.1%
Net Margin12.9%12.9%10.1%8.5%8.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.010.09
Current Ratio4.144.14———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$227.8M$227.8M$72.8M$179.6M$82.3M
Returns
ROE13.7%13.7%15.6%13.5%12.9%
Valuation
P/E16.2316.23———
EV/EBITDA0.770.77———
P/B1.121.12———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.8%13.8%14.4%15.9%—
EPS Growth——60.6%20.3%—
Dividend Yield2.6%2.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +27.2%

Total return

+27.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

43.69 → n/d

Residual

+24.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+24.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.