StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
336A.T$930.00+0.65%
Fair $930.00+0.0%

336A.T

336A.T

Communication Services / Internet Content & InformationTokyo

$930.00

+6.00 (+0.65%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $930.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.7B · quality 69.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 45/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -17.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 336A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 336A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$22.0B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-17.2%

↓

Gross Margin

17.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.48

↑
52-Week Range$930
$532$1549

TradingView lightweight chart

336A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $930.00Periodo -41.9%
Fair value: $930.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+42.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-63.3%

FCF / Net income

3.06x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $7.46B · net income $-1.54B · FCF $-4.73B

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

17.7%+67.0% pts

Operating margin

-15.3%+96.3% pts

Net margin

-20.7%+91.2% pts

FCF margin

-63.3%+122.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$7.46B$7.46B$5.57B$3.68B
Net Income$-1.54B$-1.54B$-4.05B$-4.12B
EBITDA$-698.0M$-698.0M$-3.49B$-2.84B
EPS-81.78-81.78-215.20-218.82
Gross Margin17.7%17.7%-1.6%-49.3%
Operating Margin-15.3%-15.3%-45.8%-111.6%
Net Margin-20.7%-20.7%-72.7%-111.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.480.481.400.73
Current Ratio2.532.53——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.73B$-4.73B$-4.03B$-6.84B
Returns
ROE-17.2%-17.2%-83.5%-45.9%
Valuation
P/B1.961.96——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth34.1%34.1%51.2%—
EPS Growth62.0%62.0%1.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -40.0%

Total return

-40.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-215.20 → -81.78

Residual

-40.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-40.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.