StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
339A.T$970.00-0.31%
Fair $970.00+0.0%

339A.T

339A.T

Technology / Information Technology ServicesTokyo

$970.00

-3.00 (-0.31%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $970.00Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $682.0M · quality 73.3/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 76/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 339A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 339A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7.4B

P/E

6.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.3x

↓

ROE

19.6%

↑

Gross Margin

45.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.41

↑
52-Week Range$970
$956$1594

TradingView lightweight chart

339A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $972.00Periodo -39.8%
Fair value: $970.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+9.7%

FCF CAGR

+23.8%

FCF margin

29.9%

FCF / Net income

1.60x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.31B · net income $1.18B · FCF $1.89B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

45.8%+1.7% pts

Operating margin

28.3%+3.4% pts

Net margin

18.7%+3.4% pts

FCF margin

29.9%+9.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.31B$6.31B$5.65B$5.12B$4.78B
Net Income$1.18B$1.18B$584.0M$696.0M$730.0M
EBITDA$2.00B$2.00B$1.07B$1.25B$1.28B
EPS——82.5889.4793.84
Gross Margin45.8%45.8%45.9%43.5%44.1%
Operating Margin28.3%28.3%16.2%22.5%24.9%
Net Margin18.7%18.7%10.3%13.6%15.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.410.410.764.821.69
Current Ratio2.052.05———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.89B$1.89B$661.0M$682.0M$995.0M
Returns
ROE19.6%19.6%16.0%50.5%31.0%
Valuation
P/E6.546.54———
EV/EBITDA3.343.34———
P/B1.251.25———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.8%11.8%10.4%7.0%—
EPS Growth——-7.7%-4.7%—
Dividend Yield3.1%3.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -20.5%

Total return

-20.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

82.58 → n/d

Residual

-23.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-23.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.